The Organic Lie: How Big Ag Hijacked a Label Meant to Protect Us

The USDA Organic label, intended to signify purity and adherence to strict standards, has been compromised by large agribusinesses exploiting regulatory loopholes and weak enforcement. From the use of genetically engineered vaccines in organic livestock to fraudulent grain imports and the contentious approval of synthetic coatings like Apeel's Organipeel, the integrity of organic certification is under threat. Consumers seeking genuine organic products should prioritize direct relationships with local producers to ensure transparency and trust.

Organic Lies

The USDA Organic seal was designed to assure consumers of food produced without synthetic chemicals, genetic engineering, or corporate shortcuts. However, it has become a marketing tool for large agribusinesses, facilitated by lax enforcement, pre-announced inspections, and fraudulent imports.

In 2019, the National Organic Standards Board (NOSB) recommended that genetically engineered (GE) vaccines could be used in organic livestock if no alternatives existed. Enforcement of this policy is inconsistent, and watchdog groups like OrganicEye have raised concerns about the lack of verification by certifiers. As mRNA vaccines are developed for livestock by companies such as Merck and Bayer, there is no clear plan to prevent their use in organic meat and dairy.

Investigative journalist Peter Whoriskey reported that Aurora Organic Dairy, the largest organic dairy in the U.S., housed approximately 15,000 cows, with only a small fraction observed grazing on pasture, as required by organic standards. The USDA’s inspection of Aurora was conducted after the grazing season, limiting the ability to assess compliance. Despite these concerns, Aurora was found to be in compliance with organic regulations.

Whoriskey also uncovered instances of fraudulent organic grain imports from Eastern Europe and Turkey. Shipments labeled as conventional at departure were reclassified as organic upon arrival in the U.S., significantly increasing their value. Some of these grains, treated with prohibited chemicals, were used to feed livestock in USDA-certified operations.

These practices have allowed large-scale operations to capitalize on the organic label while undermining small, legitimate organic farmers. The USDA’s National Organic Program has been criticized for inadequate enforcement and failure to address these issues effectively.

Adding to these concerns is the approval of Apeel’s Organipeel, an edible coating designed to extend the shelf life of produce. While marketed as a plant-based solution, its classification under organic standards has been contentious. The Organic Materials Review Institute (OMRI) approved Organipeel as a fungicide for post-harvest use, not as a coating for further processing. This distinction has led to confusion and debate over its compliance with organic regulations.

Critics argue that the use of such coatings blurs the line between natural preservation and synthetic intervention, potentially undermining consumer trust in organic labeling. The lack of transparency regarding the full composition of Organipeel has further fueled skepticism among consumers and industry watchdogs.

To ensure the integrity of organic food, consumers are encouraged to engage directly with local farmers and ranchers. By understanding their practices and building relationships, individuals can make informed choices about the food they consume.

Organic is a practice, not a trademark. And every rancher practices organic principles in different ways– explore the full range of organic protocols by purchasing from ranchers directly through BeefMaps.com.

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Advertisements

Advertise here!

Read more

America The Titanic – Managing After Impact with the Disastrous Biden/Harris Iceberg

America The Titanic – Managing After Impact with the Disastrous Biden/Harris Iceberg

America stands at a critical tipping point. This policy paper warns that recent federal resilience initiatives, advanced under the banner of equity, have centralized control across nearly all aspects of American life—from local governance to individual choices. To protect the foundational freedoms of America’s farmers and ranchers, the I Am Texas Slim Foundation calls for immediate executive actions to dismantle these mandates and restore power to communities, pushing back against what they describe as a coordinated agenda of control disguised as resilience.

The MAHA Revolt: Two Movements Take Aim at the Food-Pharma Cartel

The MAHA Revolt: Two Movements Take Aim at the Food-Pharma Cartel

Two documents released in June—Farm Action’s policy roadmap and a viral open letter to RFK Jr.—are igniting a grassroots revolt against corporate control of food and medicine. Both demand an end to monopolies, liability-shielded mRNA injections, and USDA policies that serve Big Ag over families. What began as a health crisis has become a political realignment—from the ground up.

Cattle Supply Cliff: Why U.S. Beef Production Faces a Multi-Year Decline

Cattle Supply Cliff: Why U.S. Beef Production Faces a Multi-Year Decline

The USDA’s 2025 outlook projects a nearly 2% decline in beef production, marking the third consecutive year of contraction. With the national cattle inventory at its lowest since 1951 and heifer retention rates plummeting, the industry faces a prolonged supply shortage. This downturn benefits large meatpackers and synthetic protein investors, while independent ranchers bear the brunt.