JBS Debuts on the NYSE – Day One, Immigrant Workers Ok’d in Slaughterhouses… But What About the Children?

JBS’s NYSE debut on June 13, 2025 glossed over a dark undercurrent—just one day later, ICE green-lighted undocumented labor in meatpacking plants even as JBS pledges to purge child labor through compliance funds and tip‑lines. That $4 million settlement may buy headlines, but who’s actually verifying zero‑tolerance on-site, and why is the government pausing enforcement for adults while prosecuting staffing firms for employing teenagers? As investors cheer the stock debut, the real question is: are vulnerable children still being treated as collateral damage in the drive for profit?

JBS Debuts on NYSE

On June 13, 2025, Brazilian meat giant JBS quietly slipped onto the New York Stock Exchange under the ticker JBSAY, fulfilling its long-sought ambition to tap American capital. The listings went smoothly enough—or as smoothly as a firm steeped in child‑labor deals, trafficking allegations, bribery scandals, and Amazon deforestation controversies can manage. Behind the polished investor deck and glossy sustainability pitch was the lasting stain of a child‑labor settlement that many hoped would be BURIED. Instead, it’s barely begun.

Turning a blind eye, but with checks – not balances

Just a day after the listing, whispers turned to headlines: President Trump ordered ICE to halt mass raids at meatpacking plants, farms, hotels, and restaurants—effectively greenlighting undocumented labor in essential sectors. There were sighs of relief from lobbyists and cattlemen, but the question remains: if undocumented workers can be reclaimed as “needed” one day after mass arrests, why were migrant children being punished yesterday?

image 28

In January 2025, the Department of Labor quietly forced JBS and Perdue to pay restitution for employing children as young as 13 in dangerous, overnight sanitation jobs inside slaughterhouses. JBS dropped $4 million, funneled through the nonprofit KIND, pledging audits, hotlines, and a no‑child‑labor policy for contractors. But as trucks roll into the processing plants with undocumented hands onboard, where are the real, measurable audits? On what authority will the company enforce zero‑tolerance against the very practices its subcontractors exploited?

A double standard in enforcement

Picture this: on one hand, doors open for undocumented—or “illegal”—workers. On the other, staffing firms are shut down for employing teenagers. There’s no shortage of headlines: federal agents—until yesterday—raiding plants where migrant children might slip through contractor checks. Now, with ICE standing down at meatpacking plants, all the illegal labor in the world looks more like corporate expedience than criminal offense.

If staffing firms were malfeasant enough to drive JBS and Perdue to settlement dollars, what exactly has changed, overnight? Are these “workers of convenience” to be subjected to random audits by sanitized compliance protocols while school‑age kids are tucked into DOL remediation programs funded by the same companies? Are we now distinguishing between the useful undocumented worker and the unwanted undocumented teen in this narrative?

JBS: Debits, credits, and political cover

JBS’s NYSE debut was not just a market event—it was a geopolitical play.

The company’s U.S. arm notably surprised Wall Street by writing a $5 million check to Donald Trump’s inaugural committee—one of Trump’s largest corporate donations. It raised eyebrows in Congress. Senator Warren publicly asked: “Was this a gift, or a ticket through the back door of SEC approval?” If access to U.S. financial markets demands a down payment on inauguration swag, is that better than paying off BNDES ministers to underwrite global acquisitions, as JBS admitted under the FCPA? Maybe. But both are routes best cleared when the press isn’t watching.

Now, with Trump in the Oval Office signaling leniency for “good” undocumented workers and JBS’s shares trading freely, America’s justice apparatus has a curious “selective hand”: It punishes dairy contractors who hire kids—and cuts regulatory slack for meatpackers who prefer undocumented adults.

And what about the kids?

image 30
Photo from the US Dept. of Labor

It’s been six months since JBS pledged to safeguard children. The company claims to have fired noncompliant contractors, launched audits, and installed tip‑lines—but who is measuring it independently? KIND is supposed to distribute reparations and track community impact. Meanwhile, JBS is celebrating with U.S. stock market access, presumably to help fund its ESG agenda—though critics argue that’s largely PR repackaging.

Questions remain: Could a renewed ICE crackdown derail operations next month? Undocumented adults are now welcomed to fill meatpacking lines—while teens caught on the same floors cost companies fines and bad press. JBS got its shiny NYSE debut, but federal policy seems eager to hire undocumented workers even as it punishes child labor. Now JBS must prove its “zero‑tolerance” claims aren’t just PR—because if not, this is just another case of business as usual while vulnerable workers keep shouldering the cost.

Looking for transparency in food production? At BeefMaps.com, the only children you’ll find working on family farms are sons, daughters, and trusted neighbors—never undocumented or migrant youth. See who’s behind your beef supply chain and support farms committed to honest, local labor.

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Advertisements

Advertise here!

Read more

America The Titanic – Managing After Impact with the Disastrous Biden/Harris Iceberg

America The Titanic – Managing After Impact with the Disastrous Biden/Harris Iceberg

America stands at a critical tipping point. This policy paper warns that recent federal resilience initiatives, advanced under the banner of equity, have centralized control across nearly all aspects of American life—from local governance to individual choices. To protect the foundational freedoms of America’s farmers and ranchers, the I Am Texas Slim Foundation calls for immediate executive actions to dismantle these mandates and restore power to communities, pushing back against what they describe as a coordinated agenda of control disguised as resilience.

UK to Mandate Electronic ID in Cattle — U.S. Producers Sound Alarm

UK to Mandate Electronic ID in Cattle — U.S. Producers Sound Alarm

England’s coming mandatory EID tags have U.S. ranchers sounding the alarm, warning it paves a path toward centralized data control and AI-driven agriculture oversight. R‑CALF USA’s Bill Bullard argues that even massive plants like Cargill’s—which process thousands of cattle daily—don’t benefit from such tracing, exposing the scheme as a control tool, not a safety one. The message is clear: protect rancher data now—or lose it to unseen bureaucratic systems.

“I’d Be Better Off Selling Cocaine Than Raw Milk”: FDA Retreat Spurs Bipartisan Revolt

“I’d Be Better Off Selling Cocaine Than Raw Milk”: FDA Retreat Spurs Bipartisan Revolt

North Carolina’s reversal of a raw milk ban has ignited a national debate over food freedom, pitting consumer demand against outdated federal control. As the FDA suspends milk safety testing amid workforce cuts, questions swirl about whether the government can regulate what it no longer monitors. And in a time where selling raw milk can bring harsher penalties than cocaine, many are asking: who is the real threat?

“If the Spring’s Depleted, I’ll Lose Everything”: Ranchers Face a National Water Heist

“If the Spring’s Depleted, I’ll Lose Everything”: Ranchers Face a National Water Heist

A 66‑mile pipeline is poised to drain Pine Valley’s aquifer to quench booming Cedar Valley—a move ranchers fear will devastate springs, livestock, and heritage. This scheme echoes a growing national pattern of rural sacrifice, where inter-basin water transfers and municipal grabs hollow out farmland across the West. With expertise showing groundwater dries springs first, it’s time to ask: is urban growth worth rural extinction?