VICTORY: Senate Nukes AI Gag Clause Hidden in Trump’s $500B Megabill

The Senate just erased a ten-year AI gag order buried in Trump’s megabill—after pressure from civil liberties advocates, state legislators, and voices like Rep. Thomas Massie. The clause would’ve punished states for regulating biometric scraping, child exploitation AI, and voice cloning abuse. Now that it’s gone, states have a brief opening to act before Big Tech rewrites the rules again.

Marsha Blackburn

It was never hidden—but it almost slid through anyway.

Buried deep in the Senate version of Trump’s megabill was a 10-year ban on state-level AI regulation. The language threatened to cut off access to a new $500 million federal AI fund for any state daring to pass its own laws. Call it innovation by blackmail.


Realmilk.com
Advertisement

The tech lobby backed it. Google and OpenAI wanted uniformity. But lawmakers like Rep. Thomas Massie, civil liberties groups, and independent watchdogs sounded the alarm early.

And it worked.

The Senate voted 99–1 to strike the ban, after Sen. Marsha Blackburn withdrew support for a watered-down Cruz compromise and introduced a clean repeal. The only vote to keep the moratorium? Sen. Thom Tillis (R-NC).

image 1

“Until Congress passes federally preemptive legislation… we can’t block states from making laws that protect their citizens.” —Blackburn

The bill’s original language would have kneecapped states trying to regulate AI-generated child exploitation, biometric scraping, or voice cloning abuse—long before Congress finalizes any national framework.

This wasn’t about innovation. It was about jurisdictional lockdown.

For now, that lock has been broken. The clause is dead. The bill moves forward without it. But the broader campaign to federalize AI governance—and freeze the states out—is still very much alive.

The states have a window. Whether they use it is the next battle.

While D.C. debates digital control, BeefMaps.com connects you directly to ranchers who still believe in local food, real land, and face-to-face trust.

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Advertisements

Advertise here!